![The JPO’s Analysis in Judging the Distinctiveness of an Applied Mark. | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City](/wp/wp-content/themes/standard_en/images/common/logo.svg){kind=logo}
![The JPO’s Analysis in Judging the Distinctiveness of an Applied Mark. | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City](/wp/wp-content/themes/standard_en/images/common/logo-sm.svg){kind=logo}
2025.8.8
Trademark
2025.5.26
Trademark
The JPO’s Manner to Judge the Distinctiveness of an Applied Mark (Our firm handled).
2025.3.27
Trademark
JPO: Trademark “SD-G” Registrable – Not consisting solely of a very simple and common mark
2025.3.14
Patent
Trademark
Design
Utility Model
Amendment to the Law on the Reissuance of Patent/Registration Certificates
2025.1.29
Trademark
JPO: Trademark “NIGHT MUSK” Registrable – Neither indicating the quality of goods nor misleading as to the quality of goods
2024.12.9
Trademark
NON-USE CANCELLATION – The JPO did not allow the cancellation of the trademark registration (the JPO judged that the main part of the used trademark is the registered mark).
2024.11.29
Trademark
JPO: Trademark “SUSTAINABLE PUMP” Not Registrable – Indicates only the quality of goods/services in a common manner, and misleading as to quality of goods/services.
2024.11.29
Trademark
NON-USE CANCELLATION – The JPO allowed the cancellation of the trademark registration (the JPO judged that the main part of the used trademark does not match the registered mark).
2024.10.25
Trademark
The JPO’s Manner to Judge the Distinctiveness of an Applied Mark.
2024.9.27
Trademark
Facebook 
LinkedIn
X
YouTube