2025.08.29
The JPO’s Approach to Determining the Distinctiveness of an Applied Mark (regarding the trademark “TANABE CONSULTING”).
August 29, 2025
Trademark Attorney Katsuhisa SAKUMA (Mr.)
| Appeal Number |
Rejection 2024-006916 (JP Appl. No. 2023-38613) |
|---|---|
| Case Summary |
The applied mark “TANABE CONSULTING” consists of “TANABE” and “CONSULTING.” “TANABE” is a common Japanese family name expressed in English. The Examiner further recognized that, in the industry related to the designated services of the trademark application, the term “CONSULTING” has been used as an indication of a business category. Therefore, the Examiner refused registration of the trademark application for “TANABE CONSULTING” on the ground that the applied mark lacks distinctiveness. The trial Examiners in the appeal determined that the Examiner’s decision was correct. |
| Date of Decision |
April 24, 2025 |
| Trademark(s) |
(Applied Mark: JP Appl. No. 2023-38613) TANABE CONSULTING (standard characters) |
| Designated Goods and Services |
Business management analysis or business consultancy etc. in Class 35. |
| Summary of Decision |
The appeal Examiners reviewed the Examiner’s decision based on dictionaries and online references. As a result, the appeal Examiners held that the Examiner’s decision was correct. |
| Comments |
We also consider that the JPO’s decision to be appropriate. We suggest that applicants abroad avoid including common family names in the mark that they would like to file in Japan, as much as they can. |