2026.01.08
The JPO Trial Board finds that “UNIPRO” in a square mark is dissimilar to the famous “UNIQLO” mark.
January 8, 2026
Trademark Attorney Tatsuya Kimura (Mr.)
| Appeal Number | Opposition 2023-900278 |
|---|---|
| Case Summary | A trademark consisting of the UNIPRO logo was found to be dissimilar and unlikely to be confused with the famous UNIQLO logo. |
| Date of Decision | November 14, 2024 |
| Demandant (Applicant) | FAST RETAILING CO., LTD. |
| Trademark(s) |
Opposed-for-trademark JP Reg. No. 6746724 |
| Designated Goods and Class(es) |
Toys for domestic pets; sports equipment in class 28 |
| Judgement |
(1) Famousness of the opposer’s mark (2) Similarity of the subject trademark and the opposer’s trademark (3) Likelihood of Confusion |
| Comments |
The trademark in question seems to have been inspired by the well-known “UNIQLO” trademark of the opposing party. However, the JPO Trial Board ruled that the two trademarks are dissimilar because the letters “PR” and “QL” are distinct based on appearance and sound. Despite this ruling, it appears that the trademark in question could be capitalizing on the fame of the opponent’s trademark. Currently, the current Japan Trademark Act lacks provisions to address this type of freeriding without a finding of similarity causing confusion, which makes this outcome unavoidable. |

