![Appeal decision report – “HIGHLAND CACAO” was allowed to be registered because the trademark and cited trademark “High Land” are dissimilar | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City](/wp/wp-content/themes/standard_en/images/common/logo.svg){kind=logo}
![Appeal decision report – “HIGHLAND CACAO” was allowed to be registered because the trademark and cited trademark “High Land” are dissimilar | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City](/wp/wp-content/themes/standard_en/images/common/logo-sm.svg){kind=logo}
2020.10.15
Trademark
2020.9.29
Trademark
Appeal decision report – Trademark “POP DOT” was allowed to be registered because it does not consist solely of a mark indicating, in a common manner, quality and other such characteristics
2020.8.17
Trademark
Appeal decision report – Trademark “PPC” was allowed to be registered because appeal examiners did not find that “PPC” (abbreviation of “Personal Information Protection Commission”) was famous in Japan
2020.7.30
Patent
Japanese IP Practice Tips: Employer Rights to Employee Inventions
2020.7.30
Trademark
Olympic Games and intellectual property rights (Is parody permissible?)
2020.9.1
Trademark
Appeal decision report (THE KANSAI)
2020.7.2
Trademark
Appeal decision report (kojifujita)
2020.6.15
Trademark
Appeal decision report – INFINITY was allowed to be registered because INFINITY and cited trademark INFINITE are dissimilar
2020.6.4
Trademark
Appeal decision report – Ghana was allowed to be registered because it has acquired distinctiveness through use
2020.6.1
Trademark
Facebook 
LinkedIn
X
YouTube