Missed Deadlines and Restoration (Revival) in Japan | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City

Missed Deadlines and Restoration (Revival) in Japan | ONDA TECHNO Intl. Patent Attys.[Japan Patent Firm] | Gifu City

Access

FAQs

Japanese Patent FAQs

Missed Deadlines and Restoration (Revival) in Japan

Overview of Restoration in Japan

Q.What changed in Japan’s restoration system in 2023?

A.

As of April 1, 2023, Japan amended its IP laws to relax the standard for restoring rights when a deadline is missed. The requirement for “justifiable grounds” was replaced by a more lenient “unintentional” standard.

Q.What does “unintentional” mean in this context?

A.

“Unintentional” means that the failure to meet the deadline was not deliberate. Common examples include clerical errors, miscommunication, docketing mistakes, or unforeseen administrative issues.

Q.Does the new standard apply to Patents, Utility Models, Designs, and Trademarks?

A.

Yes. The “unintentional” standard applies to procedures under the Patent Act, Utility Model Act, Design Act, and Trademark Act of Japan. However, it applies only to statutory deadlines expressly set forth in those Acts; it does not apply to every procedure indiscriminately.

Q.What is required to request restoration?

A.

A written Statement of Reasons for Restoration must be filed, explaining:
 – The cause of the missed deadline
 – The date when the applicant became able to proceed with the procedure
 – Confirmation that the delay was not intentional

Q.What is the deadline for filing a restoration request?

A.

The request must be filed:
 – Within 2 months from the date the applicant became aware of the missed deadline, and
 – Within 1 year from the original deadline (whichever comes first)

Q.Can domestic and foreign applicants take advantage of the restoration system?

A.

Both domestic and foreign applicants can request restoration, including in the context of international (PCT) applications entering Japan.

 

PCT National Phase Entry
– Missed 30-Month Deadline

Q.Is it possible to enter the Japanese national phase after the 30-month deadline has passed?

A.

Yes. If the delay was unintentional, it may be possible to restore the right to enter the national phase in Japan. A request for restoration must be filed with the JPO under the “unintentional” standard.

Note: The request must be filed within two months from the date on which the missed deadline was discovered, and within one year from the original deadline (for patent applications).

Q.How long does it take for the JPO to issue a decision on a restoration request?

A.

It generally takes approximately six months for the JPO to issue a decision after the request is filed.

Q.Are miscommunications between agents or internal administrative errors considered “unintentional”?

A.

Yes. The JPO generally considers such circumstances to fall within the scope of “unintentional,” provided that the failure to meet the deadline was not deliberate.

Q.What documents are required when filing a restoration request for late PCT national phase entry?

A.

Required documents may vary depending on the type of procedure.
For example, in the case of late PCT national phase entry, a Japanese translation of the application is required.
The following documents must be filed with the JPO within the prescribed time limits:

  1. A written statement explaining the reasons for the failure to meet the deadline; and
  2. A Japanese translation of the PCT application (if not yet filed).

Q.What is the JPO official fee for a restoration request?

A.

The official fee for filing a restoration request in patent matters is JPY 212,100.

Q.Are there circumstances under which restoration may be denied by the JPO?

A.

Yes. The JPO may deny restoration where the missed deadline resulted from an intentional decision by the Applicant not to proceed, such as:

  • Post-deadline change in Applicant’s internal policy after initially deciding against requesting examination;
  • Non-payment of advance fees after Applicant’s decision against entering the national phase;
  • Applicant’s intention changes after initially deciding against maintaining a right and allowing it to lapse;
  • Applicant’s business or financial decision against maintaining a right;
  • Applicant’s resumption of business after a decision against maintaining a right;
  • Applicant’s decision against maintaining a co-owned right due to lack of agreement;
  • Intentional non-response to a JPO order to correct deficiencies after Applicant’s decision that the right was no longer necessary.